Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

894 So. 2d 304

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-02-23

Decided 2005-02-23

PER CURIAM.

¶1Arthur Hall appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion because the transcript clearly demonstrates that the trial judge did not become involved in the plea process. Although Rule 3.800(a) may not be the proper rule to raise a vindictive sentencing issue, we have nevertheless conducted an independent review of the record and agree with the trial court that the sentencing judge never became involved in the plea negotiations. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief.

¶2Affirmed.

/894/so2d/304 · .json · Public domain