Penton v. Healy’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 538 So. 2d 569 - Morphy, Makofsky & Masson, Inc. v. CANAL PLACE 2000 · Ratcliff v. Boydell · 854 So. 2d 386 - Gulf Outlet Marina, Inc. v. Spain · 769 So. 2d 703 - Montgomery Stire & Partners, Inc. v. London Livery, Ltd. · State v. Kyles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he weight to be given to the testimony of experts is largely dependent upon their qualifications and the facts upon which their opinions are based. Even uncontradicted expert testimony is not binding on the factfinder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.