894 So. 2d 755 - Esters v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

cited by 8 later decisions

states following

July 2016

most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rodriquez v. United States · 227 Ill. App. 3d 800 - People v. Johnson · 646 So. 2d 683 - Edgar v. State · 676 So. 2d 949 - Harper v. State · 435 So. 2d 207 - Oliver v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"`"(b) Duty of Continuing Representation. Counsel representing a defendant at any stage shall continue to represent that defendant in all further proceedings in the trial court, including filing of notice of appeal, unless counsel withdraws in accordance with a limited contract of employment as described in Rule 6.2(a), or for other good cause as approved by the court. "`"(c) Withdrawal. Counsel may be permitted to withdraw for good cause shown; however, no attorney shall be permitted to withdraw after a case has been set for trial except upon written motion stating the attorney's reasons for withdrawing." "`”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Ziegler · Raney v. State
“"`"Section (b) contemplates that the usual procedure will be that counsel initially retained privately or appointed by the court will continue to represent the defendant through all stages of the trial proceeding, including filing notice of appeal. The rationale is that that attorney has the advantage of familiarity with the case. Continued representation also guarantees that the defendant's right of appeal is not lost in the period between termination of trial counsel's responsibilities in the case and retention or appointment of counsel for an appeal, if any. See ABA, Standards for Criminal Justice, Providing Defense Services 5-5.2 (2d ed. 1986). "`" Counsel must move to withdraw by means of a formal written motion. Withdrawal will be permitted only upon order of the court in response to such motion. "'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Raney v. State · 953 So. 2d 1269 - Tolbert v. State
“(Emphasis added.) In the Committee Comments to Rule 6.2, we find the following:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Raney v. State · 953 So. 2d 1269 - Tolbert v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.