Harrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
71 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · Steinhorst v. State · 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State · 124 So. 2d 481 - Brown v. State · 609 So. 2d 493 - Rodriguez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of this rule is to `place[ ] the trial judge on notice that error may have been committed, and provide[ ] him an opportunity to correct it at an early stage of the proceedings.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Elwell v. State · State v. Roberts“sufficiently precise that it fairly apprised the trial court of the relief sought and the grounds therefore.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roberts · State v. Dort
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.