¶1concur with the following note: Regarding appellant’s eighth point of error, we do not agree that the trial judge abused his discretion by limiting trial counsel’s questions. Therefore we can only concur in the result since the majority holds harmless the alleged error. We otherwise join the majority opinion.
894 S.W.2d 330
Dinkins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 1, 1995
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1995-02-01
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-02-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 289 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably McFarland v. State (1996), Dewberry v. State (1999)
287 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →