Nations v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Almanza v. State · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos. · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Carlsen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jury was amply qualified to make a determination of the reliability of the victim’s identification of appellant in light of extensive cross-examination of the victim and the jury’s inherent knowledge of memory and its effect on perception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nations v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.