Commonwealth v. Holtzapfel’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Millili v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing · Commonwealth v. Lord · Commonwealth v. Castillo · Commonwealth v. Butler · In re Hirsch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pursuant to [Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925(b)], issues are considered waived when no 1925(b) [Statement is filed or when an issue is not included in a filed statement.” Commonwealth v. Holtzapfel, 895 A.2d 1284, 1287 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (emphasis added). . The trial court further ignored the fact that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.