Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 F.2d 1431 - United States v. Miller

United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

895 F.2d 1431 · 1990

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
7
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 10 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Washington (1994), United States v. Olano (1995)

41 federal appellate · 10 district · 12 state decisions

490199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Darden v. Wainwright · Huddleston v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Poland v. Arizona · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder Rule 404(b), any purpose for which bad-acts evidence is admitted is a proper purpose so long as the evidence is not offered solely to prove character.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'the broad prophylactic rule that a trial court must give an immediate though unrequested cautionary instruction' whenever it admits evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b); 'the burden ... to guard against any potential misuse of evidence,' ... should be borne by defense counsel, not by the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.