Barham v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis
895 F.2d 19 · 1990
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2020
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Ungar v. Sarafite · Morris v. Slappy · Maynard v. Meachum · Armant v. Marquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the denial of a continuance effectively deprives a pro se defendant of the ability to represent himself, it may constitute both an abuse of discretion and a Sixth Amendment violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“because of changes in his representation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bush
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.