Brown v. Rison’s Empirical Analysis
895 F.2d 533 · 1990
Citation profile
67 federal appellate · 14 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 109 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2012 · most notably Reno v. Koray (1995), Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Jose Luis Araujo (2001)
67 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Udall v. Tallman · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which the sentence was imposed.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... we cannot accept as reasonable a definition of “custody” that excludes enforced residence under conditions approaching those of incarceration; to do so would be contrary to the considerations of fairness that must have underlain Congress’s provision of credit for time served.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘The requirement that federal prisoners exhaust administrative remedies before filing a habeas Corpus petition was judicially created; it is not a statutory requirement.’ Therefore, failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not divest this court of jurisdiction in this habeas corpus case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.