Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 F.2d 604 - Coakley v. Sunn

Coakley v. Sunn’s Empirical Analysis

895 F.2d 604 · 1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 7 U.S.C. § 2014

Relies on Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H Munson Company Inc · Welsh II v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That is, the litigant must allege a distinct and palpable injury to himself; that the injury is somehow directly linked to the challenged activity; and the injury is one which is apt to be redressed by a remedy that the court is prepared to give.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]tate may at its option recalculate the period of ineligibility ... [if] the income received has become unavailable to the members of the family for reasons that were beyond the control of such members.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.