Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 F.2d 949 - Tazco Incorporated

Tazco Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2014

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Armstrong v. Manzo · Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc. · Chapman v. Hoage · Augusta Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. v. Fodor Contracting Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce a carrier has reported the issuance of a policy, as mandated by the regulations, the insurer is fully liable for the obligations of the operator.... The carrier is required to discharge the statutory and regulatory duties imposed on the employer, thus stepping into his shoes.... Moreover, unlike an indemnification policy, the Black Lung Benefits scheme contemplates that the insurer, as a party, may be liable in the original claims proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[The] right to be heard has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.