Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 F.3d 492 - Mitchell v. Kallas

Mitchell v. Kallas’s Empirical Analysis

895 F.3d 492 · 2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · White v. Pauly · Ziglar v. Abbasi · Meriwether v. Faulkner · Arnett v. Webster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prison officials have been on notice for years that leaving serious medical conditions, including gender dysphoria, untreated can amount to unconstitutional deliberate indifference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this particularity requirement does not go so far as to mandate a mirror-image precedent from the Supreme Court or this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An absence of treatment is equally actionable whether the inmate's suffering is physical or psychological.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.