White v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
895 F.3d 641 · 2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2025
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Atkins v. Virginia · Penry v. Lynaugh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spreitz v. Ryan · Martinez v. Ryan“was contrary to ... clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spreitz v. Ryan · Martinez v. Ryan“In making this determination, we look to the last reasoned state court decision to address the claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spreitz v. Ryan · Martinez v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.