Warnick v. Cooley’s Empirical Analysis
895 F.3d 746 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · United States v. Bagley · Griffin v. Breckenridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, in the end, a plaintiff's well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint fails to state a claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“accept[s] as true all well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint and view them in the light most favorable to [the non-movant].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements do not count as well-pleaded facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.