Hirsch v. Konig’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America · Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc. · Eisenberg v. Hartz Mountain Corp. · Pascarell ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Vibra Screw Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is just and proper to issue a § 10(j) injunction when the nature of the alleged unfair labor practices are likely to jeopardize’ the integrity of the bargaining process and thereby make it impossible or not feasible to restore or preserve the status quo pending litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the limited context of determining whether reasonable cause exists as to the occurrence of an unfair labor practice” 895 F.Supp. at 694. 9 . Even if the Court analyzed the remedy under a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.