Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 N.E.2d 1252 - Combs v. State

Combs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · McHenry v. State · Joyner v. State · Hopkins v. State · Query v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Indiana Code § 9-30-6-6 provides that blood samples collected at the request of a law enforcement officer as part of a criminal investigation must be obtained by “[a] physician or a person trained in obtaining bodily substance samples and acting under the direction of or under a protocol prepared by a physician[.]” Ind.Code § 9-30-6-6(a). This is not a requirement that may be ignored. As our Supreme Court has recognized, “the foundation for admission of laboratory blood drawing and testing results, by statute, involves technical adherence to a physician’s directions or to a protocol prepared by a physician.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[al physician or a person trained in obtaining bodily substance samples and acting under the direction of or under a protocol prepared by a physician.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.