Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2019
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anglemyer v. State · Sensback v. State · Wells v. State · Hart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The basis for the gross impact that consecutive sentences may have is the moral principle that each separate and distinct criminal act deserves a separately experienced punishment”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“did not err in imposing consecutive sentences for these separate and distinct acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baugh v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.