Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 P.2d 1183 - Partridge v. State

Partridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2016

8 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lee v. State Board of Dental Examiners · Colorado Department of Revenue v. Kirke · Douglas County Board of Commissioners v. Public Utilities Commission · Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of Highways · Industrial Claims Appeals Office v. Flower Stop Marketing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the [hearsay] statement was written and signed; (2) whether the statement was sworn to by the declarant; (8) whether the declarant was a disinterested witness or had a potential bias; (4) whether the hearsay statement is denied or contradicted by other evidence; (5) whether the declarant is credible; (6) whether there is corroboration for the hearsay statement; (7) whether the case turns on the credibility of witnesses; (8) whether the party relying on the hearsay offers an adequate explanation for the failure to call the declarant to testify; and, finally, (9) whether the party against whom the hearsay is used had access to the statements prior to the hearing or the opportunity to subpoena the declarant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.