Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 P2D 161 - People v. Reali

People v. Reali’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Arizona v. Fulminante · Kastigar v. United States · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The record establishes that none of [Ms. Reali’s immunized] testimony influenced this witness.... [T]he only feature that the witness relied upon in identifying [Ms. Reali] as the purchaser of the mask was her physical appearance and, possibly, the sound of her voice.... [T]he privilege against self-incrimination does not extend to non-testimonial actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is not limited to a negation of taint; rather, it imposes on the prosecution the affirmative duty to prove that the evidence it proposes to use is derived from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[slecond, and perhaps more significant, defendant here made a detailed, non-immunized statement describing her part in the killing before giving any immunized testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.