Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 P2D 994 - Jordan v. State

Jordan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2013

6 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. State · United States v. Cohen · United States v. Martinez · United States v. Moody · United States v. McClure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inconsistent with ... a substantial period of imprisonment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Alaska Statute 12.55.155(d)(13) calls for a two-prong determination: first, the court must determine on a case-by-case basis that the defendant's present and prior crimes are consistently minor; second, the court must find that the past and present crimes, taken as a whole, are inconsistent with a sub-stantial term of imprisonment. Because the first prong of factor (d)(13) focuses on the seriousness of [the defendant's] current and past crimes, requiring a finding of minor harm for each offense, our conclusion that his current offense is not among the least serious in its class precludes finding that the mitigating factor has been established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “if its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.