¶1Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
895 So. 2d 1263
Jefferson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-03-09
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2010
3 state decisions
Relies on Seabrooks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-03-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →