3M Co. v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 319 So. 2d 652 - Paymaster Oil Mill Company v. Mitchell · 735 So. 2d 161 - Donald v. Amoco Production Co. · 431 So. 2d 475 - City of Jackson v. Locklar · 641 So. 2d 20 - Tharp v. Bunge Corp. · 597 So. 2d 1282 - Munford, Inc. v. Fleming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“benefit of all favorable inference [sic] that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“plaintiffs have the burden of showing that the `defect that allegedly was the proximate cause of their injury existed at the time that the product left the hands of the manufacturer, and that the defect rendered the product unreasonably dangerous.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“demonstrate that some other warning would have given them additional information that they did not already know and that they would have acted upon that new information in a manner that would have avoided the injuries.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.