Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

895 So. 2d 857

Newton v. Wright

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 6, 2004

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2004-08-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2013

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relies on Ex Parte Newton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-08-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

¶2A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded, by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Newton, 895 So.2d 851 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of George Wright, Georgette Wright, and Guy Wright on the claim asserted by Robert H. Newton, Sr., under § 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala.Code 1975, is hereby reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

¶3REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.
/895/so2d/857 · .json · Public domain