Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

895 S.W.2d 635

State v. Beal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2003

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant Vernon Beal appeals after a jury convicted him of attempting to steal a motor vehicle. Defendant also filed a notice of appeal from the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief but abandoned his appeal by not briefing any points of error relating to the motion court’s order. We affirm.

¶3We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

/895/sw2d/635 · .json · Public domain