Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 SW2D 701 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Kutzner v. State (1999), Hartsfield v. State (2010)

104 state decisions

500199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In Re King's Estate · Thompson v. City of Louisville · Butler v. State · Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[W]hen the quantity of a substance possessed is so small that it cannot be measured, there must be evidence other than mere possession to prove that the defendant knew the substance in his possession was a controlled substance.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In my view we erroneously relied on Cantu and Reyes in Daniels v. State, 574 S.W.2d 127 (Tex.Crim.App.1978), in holding for the first time that other evidence might be used to prove knowledge for purposes of possession where the quantity of the substance was too small to be measured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Therefore, the State must prove, through other evidence, that appellant had knowledge that the substance in his possession was cocaine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.