Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 895 SW2D 756 - Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Geesa v. State · Meraz v. State · Penagraph v. State · Stone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the simulated controlled substance was packaged in a manner normally used for the delivery of a controlled substance; (2) the delivery or intended delivery included an exchange of or demand for property as consideration for delivery of the substance and the amount of the consideration was substantially in excess of the reasonable value of the simulated controlled substance; and (3) the physical appearance of the finished product containing the substance was substantially identical to a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.