Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 896 F.2d 1189 - Sweet Transfer Storage Inc Miyao

Sweet Transfer Storage Inc Miyao’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

200199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Acosta v. Louisiana Department of Health and Human Resources · San Diego Committee Against Registration & The Draft (CARD) v. Governing Board of Grossmont Union High School District · Calhoun v. United States · Munden v. Ultra-Alaska Associates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “monitor the dockets to inform themselves of the entry of orders they may wish to appeal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[l]ack of notice of the entry does not affect the time to appeal or relieve or authorize the court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed, except as permitted in Rule 8002”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f a timely motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is filed in the district court by a party: ... (iii) under Rule 59 to alter or amend a judgment; ..., the time for appeal for all parties shall run from the entry of the order denying a new trial or granting or denying any such other motion. A notice of appeal filed before the disposition of any of the above motions shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion as provided above. ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.