Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 896 F.2d 126 - D1291 v. Weaver

D1291 v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2022

2 federal appellate ·

801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. United States · Mattox v. United States · Tanner v. United States · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Rule 28] requires that the appellant’s argument contain the reasons he deserves the requested relief ‘with citation to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.' ” Weaver v. Puckett, 896 F.2d 126, 128 (5th Cir.1990)) (citations omitted); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993) (although entitled to a liberal construction of their briefs, pro se litigants”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.