Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 896 F.2d 271 - United States v. Duncan

United States v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

896 F.2d 271 · 1990

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably United States v. Garrett (1990), United States v. Fernandez (2004)

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Russell · Hampton v. United States · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the Supreme court itself ultimately will validate the doctrine of outrageous conduct seems doubtful. In Hampton v. United States, [ 425 U.S. 484 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 , 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976) ] a three judge plurality opined that “[t]he remedy of the criminal defendant with respect to the acts of governmental agents, which far from being resisted, are encouraged by him, lies solely in the defense of entrapment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there was no injury to innocent third parties as the government merely sent Duncan copies of previously seized child pornography.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an outrageous governmental conduct defense must be made the subject of a pre-trial motion under Rule 12(b)(2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.