Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

896 F.2d 547

Docket No. 89-6613.

Reed v. Kelly

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Sept. 27, 1989. Decided: Jan. 26, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-01-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Freddie Taylor v. Cumberland County District Attorney's Office Sharon Rippe, Assistant Prosecutor

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-01-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Lee Reed, appellant pro se.

Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James Lee Reed seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Reed v. Kelly, CA-88-730-R (E.D.Va. April 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/896/f2d/547 · .json · Public domain