Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 896 F.2d 661 - Peterson v. Scully

Peterson v. Scully’s Empirical Analysis

896 F.2d 661 · 1990

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
December 2012
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Thomas Garcia v. Hazel Lewis Hale Creek Correctional Facility (1999), Quirama v. Michele (1993)

11 federal appellate ·

200199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Griffith v. Kentucky · Harris v. Reed · United States v. Johnson · Benjamin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f a state appellate court refuses to review the merits of a criminal defendant's claim of constitutional error because of his failure to comply with ... a `contemporaneous objection' rule, a federal court generally may not consider the merits of the constitutional claim on habeas corpus review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a procedural default does not bar consideration of a federal claim on ... habeas review unless the last state court rendering a judgment in the case 'clearly and expressly' states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Appellate Division's opinion makes no mention of a procedural bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.