Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 896 F.2d 698 - Butler v. Castro

Butler v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis

896 F.2d 698 · 1990

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Pangburn v. Culbertson (1999), Kern v. City of Rochester (1996)

15 federal appellate ·

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Hudson v. Palmer · Hughes v. Rowe · Sullivan v. Town of Salem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conclusory allegation ... without evidentiary support or allegations of particularized incidents, does not state a valid claim.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] voucher must be given to an arrestee for non-contraband property seized [and] must also give notice of the procedures to be followed to recover such property.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In passing, we note the absence of any ameliorative legislation with respect to Administrative Code [§ ] 14-140 in the more than thirteen years since the entry of the McClendon order. This would seem a matter worthy of legislative attention.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.