Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

896 F.2d 864

Docket No. 86-1723.

FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • FW/PBS, INC., Etc., et alv.The CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al
  • John Randall DUMAS d/b/a Geno's, Plaintiff, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc., et alv.CITY OF DALLAS, Etc
  • Calvin BERRY, III, et alv.CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-02-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2014

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

6 counsel of record

Relies on Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-02-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Malcolm Dade, Dallas, Tex., for FW/PBS.

Arthur M. Schwartz, Denver, Colo., for FW/PBS, et al.

Frank P. Hernandez, Dallas, Tex., for Calvin Berry, III, et al.

Richard L. Wilson, Orlando, Fla., for Tamers, et al.

David LaBrec, Office of the City Atty., Vol Villasana, Mark O'Briant, Tom Brandt, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Bruce A. Taylor, Phoenix, Ariz., for amicus--Citizens for Decency Through Law, Inc.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Jerry Buchmeyer, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before THORNBERRY, GARWOOD and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Our decision affirming the district court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part by the United States Supreme Court and remanded to this court. --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 596, 107 L.Ed.2d 603. We remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court.

/896/f2d/864 · .json · Public domain