United States v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
896 F.3d 1185 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Rivera · United States v. Charley · United States v. Mejia-Alarcon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n appellant who fails to preserve an evidentiary objection below may argue and establish plain error on appeal,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]ailure to argue plain error on appeal waives the argument.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a district court restricts cross-examination at trial, the party seeking to cross-examine forfeits a challenge on appeal by failing to state the ground for objection, stating a different ground at trial than on appeal, or by failing at trial to object to the limitation at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burke v. Regalado
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.