Badger v. Madsen’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Camp v. Shannon · 38 Cal. 3d 276 - Asdourian v. Araj · 64 Cal. 2d 278 - Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin County · Higgins v. Salt Lake County · Hamblin v. City of Clearfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when shareholders attend and participate in a meeting, either in person or by proxy, they cannot later claim that any action taken at the meeting was invalid because of improper notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Levanger v. Vincent“will affect a substantive right of one of the parties and possibly prejudice that party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“substantial ... compliance satisfies the policy of the statute[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Levanger v. Vincent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.