Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Barnes v. United States · State v. Young · 594 So. 2d 292 - Fenelon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The joint possession of two or more persons acting in concert is 'exclusive' as to any one of them.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[G]reat care should always be observed by the judge to avoid the use of any remark in the hearing of the jury that is capable, directly or indirectly, expressly, inferentially, or by innuendo, of conveying any intimation as to what view he takes of the case, or that intimates his opinion as to the weight, character, or credibility of any evidence adduced. All matters of fact, and all testimony adduced, should be left to the deliberate, independent, voluntary, and unbiased judgment of the jury, wholly uninfluenced by any instruction, remarks, or intimation, either in express terms or by innuendo, from the judge, from which his view of such matters may be discerned. Any other course deprives the accused of his right to trial by jury, and is erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“inextricably intertwined with the crime itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Waldron v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.