¶1Appellant Stephen Frye appeals the Final Judgment of Modification entered by the trial court changing the primary residence of the parties’ minor children. Because appellee has neither alleged nor demonstrated through proof the requisite elements for a change of their minor sons’ custody, we reverse. See Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, the Final Judgment of Modification is REVERSED and VACATED to the extent it pertains to the minor sons, including changes to their custody and support payments.
896 So. 2d 836
Frye v. Frye
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 22, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-02-22
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2019
11 state decisions
Relies on 444 So. 2d 1034 - Zediker v. Zediker
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-02-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →