Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

896 S.W.2d 501

State v. Roedner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-28

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2007

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant, Kent M. Roedner, appeals his convictions for attempted rape and attempted sodomy. While not briefed on appeal and therefore abandoned, Defendant originally consolidated with the direct appeal an appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

¶3We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

/896/sw2d/501 · .json · Public domain