Spaulding v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2002
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 272nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Geesa v. State · Cole v. State · Reed v. State · Littles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A document may be authenticated under either rules 901 or 902, and it need not be authenticated under both.” Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582, 586 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Spaulding v. State, 896 S.W.2d 587, 590 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no pet.). 5 . Appellant refers the Court to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.