Standard Distributing, Inc. v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Johnson v. Chrysler Corporation · M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le Beau · Olney v. Cooch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the appeal is determined on the record and is not de novo, it is well established that the appellate court does not sit as the trier of fact, rehear the case, or substitute its own judgment for that of the Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he only role of the appellate court is to determine whether the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.