Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 103 - White v. Napoleon

White v. Napoleon’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.2d 103 · 1990

Citation profile

254
cited by 254 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 62 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 254 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Spruill v. Gillis (2004), Darryl Leon Rouse v. William Plantier Acting Superintendent of Adtc (1999)

33 federal appellate · 62 district · 2 state decisions

11801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Gregg v. Georgia · Daniels v. Williams · Paul v. Davis · Turner v. Safley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 254 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “official retaliation for the exercise of any constitutional right creates an actionable claim under Section 1983. 'Retaliation for the exercise ' of constitutionally protected rights is itself a violation of rights secured by the Constitution actionable under section 1983/”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n the medical context, an inadvertent failure to provide adequate medical care cannot be said to constitute `an unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain' or to be `repugnant to the conscience of mankind.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[C]ertainly no claim is stated when a doctor disagrees with the professional judgment of another doctor. There may, for example, be several acceptable ways to treat an illness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.