Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

897 F.2d 1067

Docket No. 88-3375.

Stano v. Dugger

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 16, 1990.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stano v. Dugger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-03-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Smith v. Fw Morse & Co Inc (1996), Merritt v. Dillard Paper Co. (1997)

16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

380199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mark E. Olive, Georgia Resource Center, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant, cross-appellee.

Margene A. Roper, Belle Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion November 17, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 889 F.2d 962)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

/897/f2d/1067 · .json · Public domain