Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 1248 - International Union, United Mine Workers v. Racho Trucking Co.

International Union, United Mine Workers v. Racho Trucking Co.’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.2d 1248 · 1990

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
August 2013
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Country Floors Inc v. A Partnership Composed of Gepner and Ford (1991), Gray

27 federal appellate · 1 district ·

330199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Maryland v. Craig · Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific Railroad · O'Donnell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e apply the test provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c): (1) is there no genuine issue of material fact and (2) is one party entitled to judgment as a matter of law?”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A collective bargaining agreement is not an ordinary contract for the purchase of goods and services, nor is it governed by the same old common-law concepts, which control such private contracts. It is a generalized code to cover a myriad of cases which the draftsman cannot wholly anticipate. The collective bargaining agreement covers the whole employment relationship. It calls into being a new common law' — the common law of a particular industry or of a particular plant. [Emphasis added.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.