Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 346 - United States v. Freeman

United States v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.2d 346 · 1990

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. Bieri (1994), Saldana v. State (1993)

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

1901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2321 · 18 U.S.C. § 511

Relies on United States v. Leon · Elkins v. United States · Massachusetts v. Sheppard · Vermont v. Cox · Hanil Bank v. Michelman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We apply the exclusionary rule to violations of Rule 41 only if a defendant is prejudiced or reckless disregard of proper procedure is evident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] warrant underlying a federal conviction must be examined in light of federal standards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.