United States v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis
897 F.2d 414 · 1990
Citation profile
89 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Mistretta v. United States · Nicholas v. United States · United States v. Diaz-Villafane · United States v. Pinto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Cases are considered related if they ... were consolidated for trial or sentencing.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]hese application notes are not binding law, they are only advisory commentary to assist in the application of the statute.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]rior sentences imposed in related cases are to be treated as one sentence for purposes of the criminal history.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.