United States v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis
897 F.2d 490 · 1990
Citation profile
78 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010 · most notably United States v. Walton (1990), United States v. Kikumura (1990)
78 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986)
Relies on McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Proffitt v. Florida · Pelaes v. United States · United States v. Urrego-Linares
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[n]ormally, failure to alert the trial court to an error precludes review of that same issue by this court'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“was not charged or convicted of any crime[s] except the crime[s] to which [he] pled guilty,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.