Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 696 - Mesalic v. Fiberfloat Corp.

Mesalic v. Fiberfloat Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.2d 696 · 1990

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 20 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Robertson-Ceco Corp. (1996), Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen Michaels (1992)

24 federal appellate · 20 district · 2 state decisions

530199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prior negotiations and contemplated future consequences, along with the terms of the contract....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “accords with the notions of 'fair play and substantial justice.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “automatically establish sufficient minimum contacts in the other party's home forum....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.