Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 909 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.2d 909 · 1990

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
October 2002
most recently cited

38 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on United States v. White · United States v. Nowicki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742(a) ... allows review of a sentence imposed in conformity with the Guidelines on grounds that a co-defendant was treated differently.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not all crimes by co-conspirators are to be considered [in sentencing a particular defendant], but only conduct which the defendant could reasonably foresee in connection with the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he record is devoid of any demand in the district court that the government detail its calculation. [Appellant] may not make such a demand for the first time on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.