Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.2d 935 - Peterson Armstrong v. E Peterson

Peterson Armstrong v. E Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus, Snyder v. Dewoskin (1997)

6 district · 1 state decisions

2601990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · White v. Stump · Samore v. Graham · Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Tveten · Armstrong v. Lindberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[tjhere is no doubt that the law as it exists on the date of filing determines a debtor’s claimed exemptions. 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(2)(A).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If events subsequent to the date of filing are allowed to alter a debtor’s exemptions, uncertainty and subsequent litigation could impede a debtor’s fresh start. Moreover, allowing postpetition facts to alter a debtor’s homestead exemption might cause confusion in real estate titles and make it more difficult to finally resolve bankruptcy cases. Consideration of post-petition facts would thus hinder the quick, expeditious resolution of bankruptcy disputes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The homestead of any person, whether married or unmarried, residing in this state shall consist of the land upon which the claimant resides, and the dwelling house on the land in which the homestead claimant resides, with all its appurtenances, and all other improvements on the land, the total not to exceed eighty thousand dollars in value, over and above liens or encumbrances or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.